In order to understand how energy can be extracted from “empty space” one needs to know that space is filled with a kind of energy. It is important to know what this energy is composed of and whence it sprang.

The answer to this question will startle and perhaps delight you.

It is characteristic of most people to deny their own beliefs, and they often defend to the death the errors of their ways. Big corporations, governments, even churches, as we have seen recently with pedophile priests, all tend to defend their shame.

And so it is with egotistical diehards of the scientific community, who have resisted new discoveries since time immemorial.

Most often rote learning requires the sacrifice of common sense. The unfortunate result of exchanging a sheepskin for common sense is the inability to see one’s own contradictions.

Young physicists are taught that the universe began with a “big bang,” despite the fact that the big bang theory has been effectively disproved.

The physics associated with the big bang theory contradicts itself.

In simple terms, if the universe began with something infinitely small, infinitely hot and infinitely dense, as modern science suggests, then they are speaking about some kind of (plasma) pre-physics condensed mass.

Any fifth-grade science student should be able to see the contradiction. If scientists were open to it, common sense could show them that mass cannot exist without space-time. Nothing exists before time, so there could be no mass.

The bang theory goes on to expose a self-evident contradiction. It says that from a tiny “mass,” time preceded. But the laws of physics forbids mass to pre-exist space-time. It is clearly established that time needs to exist first, in order to allow for the smallest subatomic particles like neutrinos to exist.

Not one physicist can contradict this argument. Therefore whatever was poised to become the material universe it could only exist outside what is now the Cosmos.

"The universe had to begin with the rush of time flowing from the source of the Mover, Himself unmoved."

This gives rise to the next question. What form did the universe’s beginning take? If it did not begin with a mass, what other form of energy did it take?

This writer proposes that there is a form of energy that is primordial, non-material and cannot be measured except by the ticking of a clock. Einstein said that matter is energy and energy is matter. Matter, then, is another form of energy. 

Einstein also said that there is no ether, but if it were, it would have to be non material.

The energy of time fits his description. Therefore, if matter cannot exist without space-time and time preceded the big bang, it must be said that time moves from its timeless source, like a kind of reverse black hole.

Time is the motion from its motionless source, out of which the entire universe is (still being) formed.

Turn on your garden hose and observe how a stream of water flows from its source. The motion or the current of the stream is equivalent to both time and distance in physics. As long as the water flows, the distance the water moves from the source increases infinitely.

The flow of time is similar. Time flows out from a still source. This flowing is not yet space-time, simply because mass has not yet been created. There is no distance without the presence of mass.

Time becomes space-time distance only when subatomic particles form from the essence of its (time’s) current. Time then passes into distance. When the sheer velocity of time’s motion spins energy from its current, then we shall have space-time “distance.” 

Just as flowing water has an increasing distance and energy from its source, so what will become space-time, with respect to mass lagging in space, will always have the same consistent density no matter how far the boundaries of the universe expand from its creation source. 

As you can see, there never was a big bang. The universe had to begin with the rush of time flowing from the source of the mover, Himself unmoved. He is holding the hose.